Guildford City Football Club
February 15th, 2010 by zoefranklinMany of you will have seen a piece on Guildford City Football Club’s proposals regarding the Slyfield Area Regeneration project in the Surrey Advertiser on Friday (if not click here) and I thought that I would expand a little on my comments.
I and a number of other councillors have received detailed brochures on Guildford City’s proposal that a new football ground be built as part of the Slyfield Area Regeneration. The brochure explains that such a ground could be a permanent base for Guildford City and also potentially help Guildford Boxing and Table Tennis clubs. Reading through the Club’s proposals I felt they were very interesting and showed a potentially exciting opportunity to put Guildford football ‘back on the map’.However it is important to remember that the Slyfield Regeration is still in its very early stages.
At present the council is still at the stage of selecting master planners who will come in and after extensive consultation with local residents and community groups will draft a plan of how the development may look. It is during this process of consultation that ideas such as those from Guildford City FC will be looked at and considered as to whether they would fit the vision of the regeneration project.
I will of course keep you posted with any news as I know there are many local residents who are keen fans of the club.
Concerns over potential sale of Burpham Court Farm
February 7th, 2010 by zoefranklinCouncillor Zöe Franklin said, “There is no question that the council should let the farm land and outbuildings as it will ensure that they are maintained and income continues to come in from the site. However we are concerned that selling the farmhouse and cottages on the open market is a short-sighted decision that will cause long-term problems.
Land at Burpham Court Farm has a crucial role to play in the Slyfield Regeneration Project, whether as land for any potential new link to the A3 or as a means of fulfilling legal requirements for public green space. By selling off the properties at the site you introduce the problem that any tenants will views on such developments and may raise objections which would throw the Slyfield project into jeopardy, or at least significantly increase the councils costs.”
Councillor Victor Searle added “I am disappointed that there seems to have been little consideration to the fact that should the farm land and buildings be let to an organisation for use as a public farm or similar there may be a need for accommodation for the site manager, staff or even users. If the farmhouse and cottages have been sold off these would not be available for this use and it would be to difficult to secure planning permission for new buildings given the flood risks and the site’s designation as Green Belt . Public farms such as Burpham Court are rare and we should be taking a much broader approach which will provide maximum benefit to the community when making any decision regarding the site.”
You can read press coverage of this story at GetSurrey.co.uk






